LOIC has been used in DDoS attacks, but only because groups of willing participants colluded to attack the same domain at the same time. I think it is worth pointing out that, on its own, LOIC is a DoS program, not a DDoS program. I think the hivemind is an un-official LOIC version, so better change that? - Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.94.244.195 ( talk Isn't LOIC public domain? Why does the picture say it is from copyrighted software? - Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.222.66.226 ( talk) 02:32, 30 March 2013 (UTC) Hivemind Ipsign ( talk) 05:45, 17 February 2012 (UTC) Possible Problem with the image Cheers ArishiaNishi ( talk) 16:08, 16 February 2012 (UTC) I've found a replacement link, which IMHO looks better thanks for the heads-up. Perhaps another reference source can be found to substantiate the claim. "LOIC was utilized by Project Chanology, a project by the Anonymous group, to attack websites from the Church of Scientology," I read that article, Hackers Hit Scientology With Online Attack By Robert McMillan, and didn't find any assertion that LOIC was the tool used to ddos the Church of Scientology website. What parts of this section could be removed or re-worded? - Demiurge1000 ( talk) 20:02, 23 April 2011 (UTC) too much coverage of this aspect given its significance), but in practice the notable uses are what most secondary sources will cover the tool for. The section is perhaps undue weight to some extent (i.e. It was me that added the information about people being arrested for using it, which is certainly not likely to encourage people to use it.
Loic linux how to#
I'm not anti-anon or pro-anon or anything however, it reads more like a guide on how to use LOIC than an wiki article explaining what it is. The 'Notable Uses' section has wording that seems less than neutral.
This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. Computing Wikipedia:WikiProject Computing Template:WikiProject Computing Computing articles If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests).Identify categories related to Computer Security.Review importance and quality of existing articles.Answer question about Same-origin_policy.Rtnetlink: add alloc() method to rtnl_link_ops
Loic linux Patch#
Moved IFLA_PARENT_DEV_NAME nla_policy introduction to right patch
Loic linux series#
V3: - Added basic new interface user to this series (mhi_net) reworded commit message + introduce Sergey's comment Added IFLA_PARENT_DEV_BUS_NAME attribute V2: - Squashed Johannes and Sergey changes Iosm) and to progressively integrate support into existing ones
Loic linux drivers#
The idea is to use this interface for upcoming WWAN drivers (intel WWAN framework, allowing user to dynamically create and remove WWAN This series introduces a generic WWAN link management interface to the Way to handle WWAN links, making user side integration painful. Link type (rmnet) for performing the muxing. (cdc-mbim), some exposes sysfs attribute for dynamically creatingĪdditional netdev (qmi_wwan add_mux attr) or relies on vendor specific Netdevs at init time, some relies on VLAN link for associating a context Today some drivers create a static collection of The muxing of these links is usually vendor/bus specific (QMAP, MBIM, These contexts are usually dynamically configured viaĪ control channel such as MBIM, QMI or AT.Įach context is naturally represented as a network link/device, and Most of the modern WWAN modems are able to support multiple networkĬontexts, allowing user to connect to different APNs (e.g.
0 kommentar(er)
